Thursday, July 28, 2016

Bar says defending PM on DOJ suits improper, wants AG to recuse himself

Attorney-general Mohamed Apandi Ali must recuse himself from exercising his powers as public prosecutor under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution, as he has shown himself as not a neutral decision-maker, said Malaysian Bar president Steven Thiru.
Thiru argued that Apandi's defence of Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak in relation to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) allegations was improper.
"The AG has placed himself in an obvious and untenable position of conflict of interest.
"He is disqualified - and must therefore recuse himself immediately - from exercising his prosecutorial powers as public prosecutor under Article 145(3). Should there be any recommendation for prosecution over these allegations, he will not be seen as a neutral decision–maker," he added in a media statement.
Thiru was referring to Apandi's recent statements, in which the AG expressed his strong concerns at the insinuations and allegations of alleged criminal wrongdoing made against the PM, in relation to the civil action filed by the DOJ.
He said it was improper for Apandi to speak for, or defend, the PM regarding the allegations made by the DOJ in respect of 'Malaysian Official 1'.
The DOJ had described Malaysian Official 1 as “a high-ranking official in the Malaysian government who also held a position of authority with 1MDB”.
It also alleged the funds misappropriated from 1MDB, were fraudulently diverted through various intermediaries, and thereafter to various bank accounts, including that of Malaysian Official 1.
“These allegations appear to relate to the private and personal conduct of the PM. By (appearing to defend the PM), the AG has exceeded his constitutional mandate,” he said.
The Malaysian Bar president reminded that the AG has two separate and distinct roles under the Federal Constitution.
“He is the principal legal adviser to the government under Article 145(2), which is a political role.
“He is also the public prosecutor under Article 145(3) (read with Sections 376 and 377 of the Criminal Procedure Code), which is a prosecutorial role. As a public prosecutor, the AG must act independently and impartially as the guardian of the public interest, uninfluenced by political considerations.
“It is not the role of the AG to speak for, or defend, any public official - such as the PM or any minister - in respect of any allegation of misconduct or criminal wrongdoing, committed in the public official’s private or personal capacity,” he said.
Thiru said as a result of this Apandi had overstepped and confused his constitutional functions and duties.
The AG, he added, is in a position of conflict of interest should there be any recommendation made to him, in his role as a public prosecutor, for legal action or prosecution of that public official.
Guan Eng's 'final warning'
The Malaysian Bar president also noted that Apandi had issued a 'final warning' to Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng to stop commenting on the criminal charges that he is facing, or else the AG might have to disclose the evidence the prosecution has against him.
Thiru said it was also unseemly for any prosecutor to threaten an accused person with public disclosure of evidence that had yet to be produced in court.
“Such conduct by the prosecution is to be deplored as it would encourage trial by media, and would compromise the integrity of the criminal proceedings. It would be viewed as an attempt to incriminate an accused person on unproven evidence, which would lead to prejudice and thwart a fair and just trial,” he said.
The Malaysian Bar president added that if the prosecution was aggrieved by the conduct or statements made by an accused person, he is not left without recourse.

“He can have the matter resolved with legal counsel for the accused person; and if that fails, he can raise the matter with the court for appropriate orders to be made.
“However, the prosecutor must not resort to any measure that does not promote public confidence in the fair and objective exercise of his prosecutorial powers. There should be no intimidation of the accused person,” he reminded.
The Malaysian Bar, Thiru said, urged the attorney general to strictly and scru​​pulously observe his functions and duties as provided for in the Federal Constitution, in steadfastly upholding justice. - Mkini

Cops to quiz Umno Youth leader over 'plot to topple PM' tomorrow

The police are expected to interview Umno Youth vice-chief Khairul Azwan Harun over his allegation of a high-level conspiracy to topple Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and the government.
"I was told that he will be coming tomorrow (to give his statement)," inspector-general of police Khalid Abu Bakar told a press conference this evening in Putrajaya.
In his police report filed on Tuesday, Khairul named recently retired Bank Negara governor Zeti Akthar Aziz, outgoing Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief Abu Kassim Mohamed and ex-attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail.

He said the three were suspected of providing confidential information to foreign agencies, including the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), without authorisation.
Khairul also alleged that some of the documents submitted were falsified and the information twisted to achieve their agenda.
The report came in the wake of the United States Department of Justice filing civil suits related to the alleged abuse of 1MDB funds, which contained a slew of damning claims.
[More to follow]

Woman claims dead friend's picture used in pro-Najib online blitz

A picture of a woman, whose friend claims died three years ago, has appeared in a Facebook account that defends Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.
The social media account 'Zunaidah Zain', which used the picture as the profile picture, is no longer available on Facebook.
According to a screenshot of a posting that has gone viral, 'Zunaidah Zain' said the people should support leaders, using the hashtag #RespectMyPM #BelieveinPM.
However, another social media user replied to say the picture used by 'Zunaidah' as her profile picture is actually her deceased friend.
"The picture you are using as your profile picture is of my friend, Syuhada Baharudin. She returned to her maker three years ago," Rita Abdul Rahim posted.
A check on social media showed the picture used by 'Zunaidah' to match a picture uploaded by Syuhada on her Facebook page.
Syuhada's last posting on Facebook was in June 2014.
Malaysiakini has contacted Rita for comment.
National debater too a victim
Youth group Challenger spokesperson Syed Saddiq Abdul Rahman said this is not the first time fake accounts have been set up to heap praise on Najib.
Syed Saddiq (photo) said national debater Mifzal Mohammed's picture has also been used without consent.
"His photos have been used by multiple (social media) accounts to attack me," Syed Saddiq said on Facebook.
"Like seriously, how stupid can they get? Do they really think I don't know my debate colleagues?" Syed Saddiq, who was named Asia's top debater said.
He also posted a screenshot of one 'Nazreev Najeeb' telling him on Facebook that "empty minds make the most noise".
'Nazreev's profile picture matches UiTM debater Mifzal's Google+ account profile picture.
Pro-Najib hashtags, including #BeStrongPM, have emerged on the social media following the United States Department of Justice's (DOJ) announcement that it filed lawsuits to seize more than US$1 billion in 1MDB-linked assets.
The DOJ alleged the assets were purchased using funds siphoned from 1MDB.
Those named in the lawsuits include Najib's stepson Riza Aziz and family friend Jho Low.

Najib was not named in the suit, but details of transactions of funds from 1MDB to a bank account held by 'Malaysian Official 1' matched transactions referred to by attorney-general Mohamed Apandi Ali in January.
Apandi had referred to these transactions when clearing Najib of wrongdoing in the RM2.6 billion found in the prime minister’s personal bank account.
Najib has consistently said he never abused public funds, and says the government is committed to good governance. - Mkini

Ke Bawah Duli-Duli Yang Maha Mulia Raja-Raja Melayu : A Moment In History Is Waiting

Image result for Ke Bawah Duli-Duli Yang Maha Mulia Raja-Raja Melayu :

I hope the Officials who serve the DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu do read my Blog and advise their Royal Highnesses about this matter. 

There is a direct appeal to the DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu to intervene in the present most untenable situation in the country relating to the gross malfeasance by the Prime Minister and his cohorts. 

The appeal is by a group of lawyers calling themselves Concerned Lawyers for Justice.

The people who can think and who know what is right from that which is thievery, oppression and abuse of power are quite at their wits end about what is going to happen to the country. 

Hence the appeal by this one group of citizenry to the DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu.

Other Malaysians (through some blogs) have also voiced similar hopes and appeals to the DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu.

The present situation in the country does not fit  the description of a democratic society anymore.  The country is no more functioning as a democracy.  

The legal and lawful functioning of government has been suspended through the actions and inactions of the Executive to basically preserve himself in the face of wrongful and criminal conduct.

Indeed, as per the most recent and embarrassing Court filings by the United States' Department of Justice in California, the "officials of government"  have been labelled as being part of a functioning  kleptocracy.

This has serious implications to the good reputation, good name and status of all Malaysian citizens because we are proud to be citizens of a sovereign and democratic nation which has a place among other nations and which until recently has stood tall as an exemplary country. 

The people have been proud to be under the suzerainty of the DYMM Raja Raja Melayu, who although not in the public eye all the time are constantly in the public mind as the symbols and pillars of the citizenry. The DYMM Raja Raja Melayu do represent the aspirations of the people. 

We are proud that our government is called a 'Kerajaan' from the Malay word 'Raja' which means King.  "Kerajaan Malaysia" literally translated should mean "Kingdom of Malaysia".  In practical usage it means "His Majesty's Government".

Hence all Government affairs are under the phrase 'Urusan Seri Paduka Baginda'

This identity has now been sullied by the label "kleptocracy", a charge which has been made by a foreign government which is not an enemy of our country nor an enemy to the DYMM Raja Raja Melayu.  

The United States of America is a democratic and sovereign nation which is recognised all over the world as a country that upholds the rule of law.  We have had good relations with the USA from a very long time ago.  Malaysia and the United States are good friends and allies of each other.

"Further, the FBI and our MACC had both confirmed that the MACC assisted the FBI in the investigations, thus putting the question whether the US was meddling over our internal affairs as a non-issue, as it was our own agency that provided the commitment for the cooperation into probing the cross-border criminal activity.. "

Hence such a charge of "kleptocracy" hurled at our "government leaders and officials" by a friendly country has a very bad impact on the stature of our Government  as a "Kerajaan" carrying out its obligations and duties under the  "Urusan Seri Paduka Baginda".  

This situation is an unbearable insult and untenable for every Malaysian to bear.

At times like this the rakyat really look up to the DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu to exert the very substantial influence that they have to do right by their subjects.

In a situation where the instruments of law and authority have been compromised by the Executive, the normal separation of powers in a democratic system of government do not exist anymore.  Not only have the rules been broken but the democratic mould has been smashed. 

These are unusual and not 'democracy abiding' circumstances.  The proper conduct of government and ethical behaviour of those in authority do not exist anymore. Indeed there are signs that the government may worsen as a tyranny.

Hence the appeal to the DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu to return the country back to the steady and even keel that existed in our country.

This is indeed a moment in history for the DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu. 

"The time has come for the Their Highnesses to act. And the Rakyats are looking up to their Rulers to put an end to this unprecedentedly high-level, prolonged, embarrassing and treacherous scandal."

Malaysians are sick of perpetual betrayal by Najib and his Cabinet, please leave

The US Justice Department’s move to seize the over USD 1 billion assets of the cronies and proxies of the PM that was believed to derive from the illicitly solicited money from 1MDB has compelled PM Najib to act with poker face and disposes himself as not answerable to the most gigantic financial scandal that the world historians have ever recalled. Najib has been disclaiming the public conclusive perceptions and believes that he was involved in the scandals all along but the public and the world community are just unable to digest the notion that he is innocent.

How to believe that Najib is innocent? 1MDB was his brainchild and the persons involved and mentioned in the civil law-suits by the US Attorney General are all within his family and friends. The amount involved in the purchases of expensive properties in the US by his step-son Riza and Jho Lo are beyond comprehension. So it is not by coincidence that the RM2.6 billion of funds finally landed in Najib’s personal account in Kuala Lumpur. No one believes that the RM2.6 billion was a donation. He can tell that cock-and bull stories to his foot soldiers like Salleh Keruak, Anuar Musa, Rahman Dahalan, Ismail Sabri and Mr Azalina and please Mr Najib, don’t insult other thinking Malaysians with that blatant bluffs.

Najib should surrender to the people of Malaysia and the world and just own up all his liabilities and his misdeeds and transgressions on the sovereignty of the country. He should resign together with his Cabinet for collectively responsible and accountable for this massive misappropriation of hard earned public funds to the magnitude which is beyond comprehensions. The entire cabinet has got to go for retirement and live in repentance and practise some human and self-spiritual cleansing before you ultimately face the creator.  

The legal papers that the US Justice Department produced for the seizure of assets and monies from Jho Lo and Reza Aziz are already a public documents and everyone can read and digests all its contents. It’s shocking to know how the money moved from 1MDB to the accounts of Riza and Jho Lo companies and to the personal account to the Malaysian Official 1.

We will know how the US 200 million was spent on paintings and other luxury items and how the money was spent in the Casino burrows in Las Vegas. The investigations went deep and it goes as far as the taping of Jho Lo’s conversations by FBI in his dubious dealings with the money of 1MDB. The papers also show us that the criminal charges will soon follow the civil suits on the names mentioned in the documents and of course it will also charge the Malaysian Official 1 as mentioned in it.

The situation is so grave that Najib and the entire Cabinet should be answerable to the people and the first step for Najib and the Cabinet to do is to resign en block and let the people find another clean and magnanimous leader to lead and exercise total revamp for the rotten government. I am sure there are still relevant instruments available to have the government changed apart from General Elections.

The people can’t accept insults and invectives from the lies and deceptions in perpetuity from Najib and his gangs. Najib really thinks that all Malaysians are like Salleh Keruak and Rahman Dahalan. It’s insulting for the PM to think that we are just another Annuar Musa and Ismail Sabri or Fuad Zakarshi. AND of course we are far from Adnan Mansur.

Kami hairan kenapa Apandi Ali merasa hairan dirinya dikritik

Munafik Official 1
Ini lah wajah seorang penjawat awam yang kononnya telah menjunjung kedaulatan undang-undang
Apandi Ali, seorang peguam dari Kelantan telah dilantik oleh Najib menjadi Peguam Negara setahun yang lepas. Peguam Negara sebelumnya cukup sihat untuk melakukan tugasan dan hingga kini, Tan Sri Gani Patail masih sihat untuk menjalankan aktiviti guaman beliau. Selalunya orang yang tidak sihat akan meletakkan jawatan dengan sukarela. Tetapi perkara yang sebaliknya berlaku.Beliau tidak tahu pun mengapa beliau diberhentikan oleh kerajaan. Tiada alasan konkrit yang diberikan. Agong juga tidak bertemu Tan Sri Gani untuk bertanya jika betul dia tidak boleh meneruskan kerja sebagai Peguam Negara. Semuanya dibuat dengan terburu-buru. Oleh itu, tidak ada sebab lain mengapa Apandi tiba-tiba dilantik melainkan untuk menyelamatkan Najib dari tindakan undang-undang.  Mengapa kita berkata begitu? Kita hanya perlu membaca kenyataannya yang dibuat pada bulan Januari yang lepas:
a. Tiada apa-apa keterangan yang boleh menunjukkan bahawa YAB PM mengetahui dan/atau dimaklumkan bahawa terdapat kemasukan wang daripada akaun SRC ke dalam akaun-akaun beliau;
b. Tiada apa-apa keterangan yang boleh menunjukkan bahawa YAB PM memberikan apa-apa kebenaran untuk pemindahan mana-mana wang daripada akaun SRC ke dalam akaun-akaun beliau; dan
c. Keterangan menunjukkan bahawa pada masa-masa yang material, YAB PM mempercayai segala pembayaran yang dibuat oleh beliau adalah dengan menggunakan wang sumbangan keluarga diraja Arab Saudi yang telah dipindahkan ke dalam akaun-akaun beliau sebelum itu. Berdasarkan kepada keseluruhan fakta dan keterangan, saya sebagai Pendakwa Raya berpuas hati bahawa tiada apa-apa kesalahan jenayah yang dilakukan oleh YAB PM.
Apandi Ali melepaskan Najib dari tuduhan mengambil wang SRC tanpa sedar. Walaupun alasan yang diberikan di atas adalah tidak masuk akal, terutama alasan (c), kerana wang yang kononnya datang dari keluarga DiRaja Arab (ini juga satu penipuan) telah dipulangkan oleh Najib kepada ‘penderma’ dalam bulan Ogos 2013. Jadi, bagaimana pula dia boleh terima lagi duit dari ‘Pak Arab’ di dalam tahun 2014?
We're guessing
Bukti aliran wang SRC yang diterima Najib yang kemudiannya telah dibelanjakan sesuka hati. Bukti ini ditunjukkan sendiri oleh Apandi.

Walaupun ada cukup bukti, Apandi Ali tetap berkata "tiada cukup bukti"
Walaupun ada cukup bukti, Apandi Ali tetap berkata “tiada cukup bukti”
Kita lihat juga alasan (a) dan (b) di atas, Apandi seolah-olah menjadi buta huruf sekejap kerana memperkatakan bahawa Najib tidak mengetahui terdapat wang berjuta-juta di dalam akaunnya sendiri.
Ini sahaja boleh mensabitkan Apandi sebagai seorang yang tidak jujur. Jika Najib memberitahu Apandia yang dia tidak tahu menahu bahawa duit itu datang dari mana, maka kita juga boleh menganugerahkan Najib dan Apandi sebagai Tokoh Pak Pandir Dulu Kini Selamanya.
Kita yang mereka sangka bodoh ini pun kena lah percaya bahawa Najib sememangnya tidak tahu ada duit berjuta-juta masuk, tetapi dia cuma tahu membelanjakan sahaja berjuta-juta duit tersebut dari dalam akaun peribadinya.
Walaupun Apandi menelan pil bodoh setiap hari untuk tidak menjalankan amanah yang mengiringi jawatannya, kita sebagai rakyat Malaysia sedar dan yakin bahawa alasan yang diberikan tidak lojik sama sekali.
Mana mungkin Najib tidak tahu ada wang masuk ke dalam akaun sendiri, tetapi cuma tahu membelanjakannya sahaja. Kita rakyat biasa pastinya akan terperanjat jika di dalam akaun kita tiba-tiba terdapat RM50 juta. Adakah kita akan bertanya kepada bank, dari mana datangnya wang tersebut? Atau adakah kita hanya akan bersiul-siul dan membelanjakan berjuta-juta ringgit untuk membeli barangan-barangan mewah seperti yang telah dibongkarkan di dalam bulan Mac yang lepas?
Jika kita membelanjakannya tanpa ingin mengetahui dari mana wang itu datang [seperti alasan (a) dan (b) di atas], maka kita telah berlaku curang dan tidak jujur terhadap harta benda rakyat.
Dan yang lebih penting, oleh kerana Apandi sendiri mengaku Najib mendapat wang berjuta-juta dari SRC, mengapa Najib tidak memulangkan semula wang tersebut kepada SRC? Mengapa dia boleh berjoli sakan menggunakan wang tersebut untuk kepentingan peribadinya? Wang tersebut bukannya harta dia, malah duit rakyat Malaysia. Sudah pulangkan atau belum?
Undang-undang kanun keseksaan seksyen 403 adalah akta mengenai menyalahgunakan harta dengan curang.
Dalam bahasa mudah, A menjumpai seutas gelang berlian. Dia tidak tahu bahawa gelang tersebut adalah milik B. A menjual gelang tersebut untuk mendapatkan wang dan wang tersebut dibelanjakan untuk tujuan peribadi.
A boleh didapati bersalah di bawah Akta 403 Kanun Keseksaan (penjara dari 6 bulan hingga lima tahun, sebatan dan denda), walaupun dia tidak mengetahuinya milik siapa gelang tersebut pada waktu dia menjumpainya.
A di sini bukan calang-calang orang. Ianya adalah Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Gelang berlian tersebut pun bukan sebarang gelang, tetapi wang dari SRC yang berjuta-juta banyaknya.
Mengambil wang kononnya tanpa sedar dan membelanjakannya untuk kepentingan sendiri tetap menjadi kesalahan mengikut undang-undang Malaysia. Tetapi mengapa Apandi boleh berkata “saya sebagai Pendakwa Raya berpuas hati bahawa tiada apa-apa kesalahan jenayah yang dilakukan oleh YAB PM”?
Ini belum lagi dikaitkan dengan Akta Undang-Undang Pencegahan Rasuah 2009, di mana Najib boleh dikatakan melanggar pelbagai seksyen antaranya, seksyen 16 dan 23.
Seksyen 16: Kesalahan menerima suapan
16. Mana-mana orang yang sendiri atau melalui atau bersama dengan mana-mana orang lain:-
(a) secara rasuah meminta atau menerima atau bersetuju untuk menerima bagi dirinya atau bagi mana-mana orang lain; atau
(b) secara rasuah memberikan, menjanjikan atau menawarkan kepada mana-mana orang sama ada bagi faedah orang itu atau bagi faedah orang lain
Seksyen 23: Kesalahan menggunakan jawatan atau kedudukan untuk suapan
23 (1) Mana mana pegawai badan awam yang menggunakan jawatan atau kedudukannya untuk apa apa suapan, sama ada bagi dirinya sendiri, saudaranya atau sekutunya, melakukan suatu kesalahan
Oleh kerana Apandi telah tidak melakukan tugasnya dengan betul, sebab itulah dia menerima kritikan hebat dari orang ramai. Apandi mesti menepuk dada dan tanya selera sendiri, kenapa dia tidak membuat kerjanya dengan betul.
Berdasarkan undang-undang yang disebut di atas, kita merasa hairan kenapa Apandi masih tidak mahu berjalan di landasan yang benar. Secara munafiknya,dia telah menyebut perkara di bawah:
“Apa saja yang saya lakukan adalah mengikut undang-undang negara. Begitupun, masih ada pihak yang sanggup mengemukakan usul tidak percaya terhadap saya di Dewan Rakyat, mendesak saya untuk meletakkan jawatan, malah mengheret saya ke mahkamah.”
Undang-undang negara mana yang diikutnya? Undang-undang Malaysia, atau undang-undang Najib?
Dia juga telah memberi nasihat ringkas:
“Saya sekali lagi mengingatkan semua pihak supaya menjunjung kedaulatan undang-undang.”
Bukti semua sudah ada. Peguam Negara USA sudahpun menyelongkar aktiviti ‘Malaysian Official 1’ di dalam kes yang dibuat di mahkamah California minggu lepas. Akaun Syarikat 1MDB juga sudah tidak boleh digunapakai kerana terdapat banyak kepincangan dan pecah amanah.
Mungkin Apandi patut mengikut nasihatnya sendiri, barulah susah untuk orang ramai mengkritiknya. -jebatmustdie

Salah guna wang Yapeim: Mahkamah batal saman fitnah Jamil Khir

Jamil Khir menyaman NOW kerana dituduh menggunakan dana Yapeim bermain golf dan lawatan ke pusat beli-belah di luar negara.
KUALA LUMPUR: Mahkamah Tinggi hari ini membenarkan permohonan Pengarah National Oversight and Whistleblowers (NOW) Akmal Nasir untuk membatalkan saman fitnah difailkan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri (JPM), Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom.
Hakim Datuk Nor Bee Ariffin membuat keputusan itu dalam kamarnya atas alasan saman yang difailkan Jamil Khir adalah atas kapasitinya sebagai menteri dan bukan peribadi.
Peguam Razlan Hadri Zulkefli yang mewakili Akmal memberitahu media bahawa Nor Bee memerintahkan Jamil Khir untuk membayar kos sebanyak RM3,000 kepada Akmal.
Razlan berkata mahkamah membuat keputusan itu selepas terikat dengan keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan dalam saman fitnah oleh Menteri Besar Pahang Datuk Seri Adnan Yaakob terhadap Utusan Melayu (M) Bhd yang memutuskan bahawa personaliti yang dikenali ramai yang memegang jawatan awam tidak boleh memfailkan saman fitnah atas kapasiti rasminya.
Peguam Adnan Seman yang mewakili Jamil Khir mengesahkan tentang keputusan mahkamah itu dan berkata akan berbincang dengan anak guamnya sama ada akan mengemukakan rayuan.
Pada 19 November 2015, Jamil memfailkan saman itu terhadap Akmal berhubung dakwaan penggunaan wang Yayasan Pembangunan Ekonomi Islam Malaysia (Yapeim) bagi membiayai perjalanan ke luar negara.
Beliau mendakwa Akmal memfitnahnya ketika memberi kenyataan kepada media dan di laman web menggunakan nama NOW pada 13 November 2015.
Jamil mendakwa di antara kata-kata fitnah itu adalah berkenaan pembiayaan perjalanan ke luar negara, bermain golf dan lawatan ke pusat beli-belah membabitkan kos di antara RM410,978 hingga RM590,000.
Menteri itu juga mendakwa Akmal menerbitkan kata-kata fitnah itu tanpa pengesahan terlebih dahulu hingga ia membawa maksud beliau seolah-olah tidak amanah, ahli politik yang menyeleweng dana anak yatim serta menyalah guna kuasa.
Beliau menuntut perintah injunksi bagi menghalang defendan mengeluarkan kenyataan fitnah terhadapnya, ganti rugi am, teruk serta permohonan maaf dalam cara dan bentuk yang diluluskan olehnya sendiri.