`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Saturday, September 15, 2012

A Strange World Of Skewed Perspectives And Ethnocentrism


http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/476/173d2d40445916624eef232b35154aff.jpg
When a group of army veterans conducted butt exercises outside Ambiga’s house, citing it as a democratic right, it angered many of the same people. On the other hand, many pro-government supporters defended the army veterans’ actions but were angered by the youth who “defiled” pictures of Najib and his wife. What is the difference? Skewed perspective?

Mohd Ikhram Merican
I was delighted to read RPK’s recent blog post entitled “It’s Only Symbolic.” Underlying his sarcasm is a problem that Malaysia, no, much of the whole world is succumbing to. It is a problem of skewed perspectives, ethnocentrism, and a lack of empathy.

In part, the global media, just like the Malaysian mainstream media has become a big propaganda tool that shapes how we think and how we react to our environment. On the other hand, we have become babies:
  • functioning by pure emotion, and
  • accepting wholesale anything and everything manufactured by the powers that be; governments, politicians (opposition and otherwise), religious bigots and “experts” included.
The result is a very divided world, and on a micro level, a divided Malaysia.

Is mooning and stepping on images of the Prime Minister and his wife publicly a democratic right? Certainly there are more dignified ways to express one’s democratic right. Granted, criminal action against the perpetrators is harsh but it surprises me that a significant number of people condone this behavior as a democratic right. Is this how we want our youth to express themselves?

When a group of army veterans conducted butt exercises outside Ambiga’s house, citing it as a democratic right, it angered many of the same people. On the other hand, many pro-government supporters defended the army veterans’ actions but were angered by the youth who “defiled” pictures of Najib and his wife. What is the difference? Skewed perspective?

Our western education teaches us that we should respect the rights of every individual. A good portion of us will defend LGBT rights citing democratic principles and ideas such as “consenting adults” and “individual freedom”. Yet, the same principles do not apply to people who practice polygamy with consensus between the wives. In this case, respecting individual freedoms do not apply. Skewed perspective?

In Malaysia, the political tsunami of 2008 has skewed perspectives to the extent that we are unable to look at issues with clarity. These days everything is divided along political lines. It is alright for Anwar Ibrahim to encourage party hopping but disgusting for Najib to do it. It is okay for hooligans to set-up stalls outside Ambiga’s house but it is revolting for Malaysians to demand free and fair elections.

If we lack the maturity to be discerning and to stand united on issues affecting equity for all Malaysians regardless of political affiliation, then perhaps we are not ready for democracy.

Globally, the unfortunate events of 911 has also skewed perspectives. The fear of terrorist attacks have justified undemocratic laws and practices. America’s war on terror has many a times flagrantly disregarded all the ideals that it was founded on. However, in the interest of public safety, the argument goes, it is sometimes necessary to disregard human rights and justice. If we applied reasoning, and empathy, we would see this for what it is – hogwash.

Thanks to technology, the world is now metaphorically smaller. We are a big global village. Yet, we have become very ethnocentric. Groups like Perkasa flourish in this side of the global village. And mind you, just because there are no official Chinese and Indian equivalents do not mean that extreme ethnocentrism is absent from the non-Malay population. I have American and European acquaintances who are no different either.

Ethnocentrism is the act of “judging another culture solely by the values and standards of one’s own culture” (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocentrism).  The ethnocentric road does not lead to tolerance and understanding. It breeds contempt, feelings of superiority, and animosity.

The fact of the matter is that we are made up of different cultures, religions, and classes. In a smaller world, we are going to come into contact with a larger variety of people. If we are unable to shed our ethnocentric prejudices, it will be difficult to live peaceably wherever we may be.

It is sad that many of the mainstream religionists of my faith, Islam, offer no constructive solution to living in a plural society. It is equally sad that many non-Muslims choose to stereotype Muslims in general. But do we need “experts” to tell us how to live harmoniously? Is a social contract going to be the basis of how we “tolerate” one another? After 55 years of independence in Malaysia, is that the best we (from all races) can do – tolerate each other?

I would like to think that living harmoniously comes naturally to all of us. Look at little children. They could not care less about the religion, culture, or background of their friends. No one has to “teach” them how to co-exist. Perhaps we can unload all the social baggage we have accumulated by observing little children. Perhaps we should not have to wait for government and politicians to fix things. Perhaps the Malaysia and world we crave for is a choice we have to make, not by the ballot box alone, but by conscious effort on our part.

Most religions and cultures offer a common solution, one that the “experts” do not take pains to disseminate. It is referred to as the Golden Rule. You can find it in the Quran, the Bible, the Mahabharata, and Buddhism to name a few. It states, “One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself.”

If we can take pains to live by this code, we would not need to wait for a Malaysia that respects all religions and races. If we could strictly adhere to this, the world would not be such a strange and divided place. Until we are willing to impose this rule on ourselves very strictly, we may not be that serious about a better Malaysia or a better world.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.