`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Man loses home due to Gombak land office negligence

A picture of the Federal Court in Putrajaya. The court yesterday refused to grant Ishmael Lim Abdullah leave for his appeal, which saw him lose his home due to negligence on the part of the Gombak land office. – The Malaysian Insider pic, November 19, 2014.A picture of the Federal Court in Putrajaya. The court yesterday refused to grant Ishmael Lim Abdullah leave for his appeal, which saw him lose his home due to negligence on the part of the Gombak land office. – The Malaysian Insider pic, November 19, 2014.
A man who had his land acquired without his knowledge today lost all legal recourse to get justice when the Federal Court yesterday refused to grant leave for his appeal.
Ishmael Lim Abdullah, 53, will now have to vacate the 5,000 sqm land in Templer’s Park which he had been occupying for 40 years and get a miserly compensation of just RM6,000 – the amount that the government deposited to the courts in 1974 to acquire the property for a military school.
In a unanimous decision, the five-man panel – Tan Sri Ahmad Maarop, Tan Sri Hassan Lah, Datuk Zainun Ali, Datuk Seri Abu Samah Nordin and Datuk Ramly Ali – said Ishmael’s application did not make the threshold for leave to be granted.
The ruling sends alarm bells to all land owners as it means land titles are not safe anymore and land owners will pay the price for negligence by the land office.
In Ishmael’s case, as the acquisition was not registered by the Gombak Land Office, his father did not realise he was buying encumbered property from a Singaporean in 1975. Even when the title was passed to Lim in 1992, the acquisition was not registered.
Lim was hoping that he would be paid compensation equivalent to the current market value of RM1.5 million.
But, as the appeal was dismissed, this means the offer in 1974 still stands.
This also means Ishmael who has spent close to RM100,000 in legal bills will only get RM6,000.
The Federal Court did not address the issue of the military college now moved to Putrajaya, hence the original intention for the acquisition is not valid.
There are fears that the land where Ishmael used to run a nursery will now be converted for commercial reasons.
Ishmael’s lawyer Trevor George De Silva pleaded that his client had been paying his quit rent diligently.
Prior to the appeal, the lower courts had heard that Singaporean Lim Cheng Kim did not know that the land had been acquired when she sold the land to Ishmael’s father.
When buying the land, Ishmael’s father made checks with the land office then which indicated it was without any encumbrances. Ishmael inherited the land in 1992 and the transfers were done at the Gombak Land Office.
He even charged the property to a bank for a loan in 1993.
On March 9, 2005, the Gombak Land Office issued him an eviction notice saying his land and 12 other plots have been acquired for the military college. Between 1993 and 2005, five land searches confirmed Ishmael as the registered owner of the property.
Ishmael took the Federal Land Commissioner and the Gombak Land Office to court on April 7, 2005, to challenge the eviction notice.
The High Court then ruled to keep things at status quo until Ishmael and the land administrators sort out the land issues.
In spite of this order, the Land Office proceeded to cancel Ishmael’s ownership of the land. But his name was reinstated after he filed contempt proceedings.
He eventually lost the High Court case and later at the Court of Appeal which held that the land acquisition process began in 1973 and was completed in 1974, hence the land belonged to the state.
The Court of Appeal ruled the previous owner, no longer has good title of the land. Therefore, the transfer of the land to Ishmael's father was null and void.
Notably, the Court of Appeal held that the enforcement of "Form K" to register the acquisition – a requirement under the National Land Code – was merely a formality and not fatal to the acquisition process.
The Court of Appeal also held that although Ishmael has been paying quit rent, assessment fee and was able to charge the land for a bank loan, it "does not prove that his title is indefeasible".
Speaking to The Edge Financial Daily, Ishmael said he had lost everything fighting for his rights.
“I did everything by the book.
“I have lost my home and incurred more debts. How is this right?” said a teary Ishmael. – The Edge Financial Daily
- TMI

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.