`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Tuesday, April 7, 2015

DR M, A STEP CLOSER TO CALLING NAJIB A MURDERER: I want to know who ordered Altantuya killed, you can't just hang the cops

DR M, A STEP CLOSER TO CALLING NAJIB A MURDERER: I want to know who ordered Altantuya killed, you can't just hang the cops
I was not offering to help anyone to overcome any problems.
In my blog, I'm not accusing Dato Seri Najib of committing any crime. Whether he is guilty or not can be determined if the police can make inquiries. What I asked for answers to are merely questions already raised by many people.
I acknowledge that during my time, there was loss of national wealth. But the people and the world know how this money was lost. Losses suffered by Perwaja are known. Similarly, the mismanagement of Bank Bumiputra by its management. Maminco lost as a result of the London Metal Exchange decision that tin sold by a valid purchase agreement need not be supported by metal supply to the Purchaser. It decided to rescue the Sellers. Malaysia as Buyers therefore suffered losses.
As for shipping consortium and forex, I would like to know how these hurt the government and how I got involved in these matters.
Money disappearing & Najib refusing to tell WHERE?
What is clear is that during my time, you could tell where the money was invested and where it went. In business, sometimes there is profit, sometimes loss. What is not acceptable is when money disappears and no one knows where it has gone.
Today the ringgit has fallen by 70 per cent. Each one ringgit collapse of our currency, the country, the Government and the people will lose billions. A fall of 70 per cent in the ringgit will result in losses of billions.
When the ringgit was rescued from currency speculators, the government was able to save billions. And many traders who were bankrupt or nearly bankrupt were also saved in 1998. Do you forget these events because they occurred during my time.
In the case of 1MDB, there has been no satisfactory answer regarding the debts of RM 42 billion. Why pay over 10% commission to Goldman Sachs just for selling bond or making loans to the Government. Why pay interest of 5.9%, which is a very high interest rate.
Also questionable is the role played by Jho Low. Who is he to be entrusted with handling 1MDB's billions of dollars belonging to the Government. There is no similarity between Jho Low with Daim, who was appointed by me as a Minister.
Where is the source of the hundreds of millions of ringgit to buy buildings and to invest in the film "The Wolf of Wall Street" by Riza Aziz, stepson of Dato Seri Najib.
I am not accusing Dato Seri Najib. I asked a few questions over the billions of debt, which will be borne ultimately by the people. The answers were also not given by those who condemned me for asking, other than saying I have vested interests or have done the same in my time.
When I resigned, there were efforts made to obtain evidence I had burned money for the Government. If you want to start further investigations, I have no objections.
Formerly blind support, why suddenly question Najib: Because murder is involved?
Readers portal "Free Malaysia Today", Izack Chin asked why I formerly supported Dato Seri Najib to replace Tun Abdullah. At that time, Najib appeared 'clean'. Now there is suspicion among those whose questions have not been answered.
It has been eight years, why raise the issue (Altantuya's murder) now? But this is not about a problem that happened eight years ago. I am questioning a problem connected to today - the issue of two policemen sentenced to death. It is grossly unfair if they were killed when they were doing their jobs as lower-ranked police officers only follow orders.
I just want to know who issued the order to Sirul and his colleague (Azilah Hadri) to kill Altantuya.
Salleh Said Kruak compares Low Taek Jho and my critic of him with the criticism against me regarding Ananda Krishan’s involvement in Petronas and the appointment of my friend Daim Zainuddin as Finance Minister. I really do not see any similarity.
Ananda Krishnan bought the race course in Jalan Ampang. He could develop this prime land by himself. But he decided to sell one half share of the 100 acres land to Petronas and developed it together. Later he sold his tower to Petronas. What is wrong with that? Petronas made tons of money from the project.
There is no similarity at all between Temasek of Singapore and 1MDB. Temasek did not lose money but money borrowed by 1MDB has disappeared.
1MDB is not excess fund belonging to the Government. 1MDB borrowed all its billions. Borrowed money cannot be regarded as wealth. So far the only asset owned by 1MDB are the pieces of land bought from the Government at a price very much below market price. They have been highly revalued. But until they are sold, they cannot be used to pay the 42 billion the 1MDB borrowed. They cannot even pay the interest.
As for the comment that it is unfair for me to ask Najib to step down as he was elected through democratic process, I would like to remind Datuk Jamal (Md Yunos) that Tun Abdullah was also elected but Najib was partly instrumental in asking him to step down.
Political agenda, the Opposition & my sons
With regard to my political agenda, what is wrong with that? A Prime Minister must be seen to be clean and able to explain and answer questions and to be good for the country. Najib cannot even answer and has not answered any question, beyond exercising elegant silence or saying the allegations are not true.
There is also an attempt to divert attention from my question by saying that I am siding with the opposition, even that I have become leader of the opposition.
If saying something that is similar to the opposition makes me aligned with the opposition, then Najib must be more with the opposition than me because he agreed with the opposition to abolish the ISA, the prevention of crime law and ignore the NEP. He also wanted to abolish the Sedition Act as demanded by the opposition. If UMNO did not object the Sedition Act would have been abolished. So is Najib a member of the opposition?
I am still an UMNO member. My disagreement is with the leader, not with the party. I criticised the leader, not the party. It is simply because I want to see the party win. It will not win if Najib is the leader.
I had great hopes when Najib took over from Abdullah.
But he did even worse than Abdullah, losing more badly in Selangor where he was the Head of UMNO. Thre are so many scandals surrounding him now. His popularity is now even lower than when he led the BN in 2013. In a number of constituencies the margins won by Barisan Nasional (BN) are very narrow.
Sabah and Sarawak, are now no longer safe, no longer BN’s fixed deposits.
Is it too absurd to predict defeat for the BN in 2018.
As for my sons, if I had wanted them to succeed in politics I could have done so when I was Prime Minister. If they succeed it will be by their own effort. If the people don’t like them they will not get this support. - http://chedet.cc/?p=1632
(Malay text translated by Malaysia Chronicle. Below is the article from Dr M's blog in its original form)
TIDAK WAJAR MINTA TOLONG DR MAHATHIR
1. Saya tidak tawar untuk menolong sesiapa untuk mengatasi apa-apa masalah.
2. Dalam blog saya, saya tidak menuduh Dato Seri Najib melakukan apa-apa jenayah. Itu boleh ditentukan jika polis dapat membuat siasatan. Yang saya pohon ialah jawapan kepada soalan-soalan yang disuarakan oleh ramai rakyat.
3. Saya akui dimasa saya juga ada kehilangan wang negara. Tetapi rakyat dan dunia tahu bagaimana wang ini hilang. Kerugian yang dialami oleh Perwaja diketahui. Demikian juga dengan salah urus Bank Bumiputra oleh pengurusannya. Maminco rugi kerana London Metal Exchange memutuskan bahawa bijih timah yang dijual mengikut perjanjian jual beli yang sah tidak perlu ditunaikan dengan membekal logam berkenaan kepada pembeli. Ini diputuskan untuk menyelamat penjual yang tidak ada timah. Malaysia sebagai pembeli mengalami kerugian.
4. Saya ingin penerangan berkenaan bagaimana Konsortium Perkapalan dan Forex merugikan Kerajaan dan bagaimana saya terlibat dalam perkara ini.
5. Yang nyata ialah negara tahu dimana pergi wang yang dilabur semasa saya. Dalam perniagaan adakala untung, adakala rugi. Yang tidak boleh diterima ialah duit itu hilang tanpa diketahui kemana.
6. Hari ini nilai Ringgit jatuh sebanyak 70 sen. Tiap satu Ringgit jatuhnya matawang kita, negara, Kerajaan dan rakyat kerugian berbillion. Kejatuhan sebanyak 70 sen pun merugikan berbillion Ringgit juga.
7. Tetapi apabila Ringgit diselamatkan dari penyangak matawang, berbillion Ringgit duit Kerajaan diselamatkan. Dan ramai peniaga yang muflis dan hampir muflis terselamat pada tahun 1998. Lupakan sahajalah peristiwa ini kerana ia berlaku dizaman saya.
8. Tetapi dalam kes 1MDB, tidak ada jawapan yang munasabah berkenaan 42 billion Ringgit yang dihutang. Kenapa bayar lebih 10% komisyen kepada Goldman Sachs hanya kerana menjual bond atau membuat pinjaman bagi Kerajaan. Kenapa faedah 5.9% dikenakan, satu faedah yang amat tinggi.
9. Disoal juga peranaan Jho Low. Siapa dianya yang diberi kepercayaan mengendali wang 1MDB berbillion-billion ringgit milik syarikat Kerajaan. Tidak ada persamaan antara Jho Low dengan Daim yang saya lantik sebagai Menteri.
10. Dimana datangnya ratusan million Ringgit untuk membeli bangunan-bangunan dan melabur dalam filem “The Wolf of Wall Street” oleh Riza Aziz, anak tiri Dato Seri Najib.
11. Saya bukan tuduh Dato Seri Najib. Saya bertanya beberapa soalan kerana hutang berbillion ini akan ditanggung akhirnya oleh rakyat. Jawapan tidak juga diberi oleh mereka yang mengecam saya selain daripada berkata saya punyai kepentingan atau saya juga buat kerja yang sama.
12. Apabila saya letak jawatan satu usaha dibuat untuk mendapat bukti saya lesapkan duit Kerajaan. Kalau hendak buat siasatan lagi, saya tidak ada halangan.
Dahulu sokong, kenapa tidak sekarang?
13. Pembaca portal “Free Malaysia Today”, Izack Chin bertanya kenapa saya dahulu sokong Dato Seri Najib supaya mengganti Tun Abdullah. Pada masa itu Najib ternampak bersih. Sekarang ada syak wasangka dikalangan orang ramai yang tidak terjawab..
14. Sudah lapan tahun berlalu kenapa bangkit perkara ini? Ini bukan masalah lapan tahun dahulu. Yang saya soal ialah berkenaan masalah hari ini – masalah nyawa dua orang anggota polis yang dihukum bunuh. Amatlah tidak adil jika mereka dibunuh sedangkan mereka sebagai pegawai rendah polis hanya mengikut perintah.
15. Saya hanya tanya berkenaan siapa yang mengeluar perintah kepada Sirul dan rakannya.
Temasek and 1MDB
16. Salleh Said Kruak compares Low Taek Jho and my critic of him with the criticism against me regarding Ananda Krishan’s involvement in Petronas and the appointment of my friend Daim Zainuddin as Finance Minister. I really do not see any similarity.
17. Ananda Krishnan bought the race course in Jalan Ampang. He could develop this prime land by himself. But he decided to sell one half share of the 100 acres land to Petronas and developed it together. Later he sold his tower to Petronas. What is wrong with that? Petronas made tons of money from the project
18. There is no similarity at all between Temasek of Singapore and 1MDB. Temasek did not lose money but money borrowed by 1MDB has disappeared.
19. 1MDB is not excess fund belonging to the Government. 1MDB borrowed all its billions. Borrowed money cannot be regarded as wealth. So far the only asset owned by 1MDB are the pieces of land bought from the Government at a price very much below market price. They have been highly revalued. But until they are sold, they cannot be used to pay the 42 billion the 1MDB borrowed. They cannot even pay the interest.
20. As for the comment that it is unfair for me to ask Najib to step down as he was elected through democratic process, I would like to remind Datuk Jamal (Md Yunos) that Tun Abdullah was also elected but Najib was partly instrumental in asking him to step down.
21. With regard to my political agenda, what is wrong with that? A Prime Minister must be seen to be clean and able to explain and answer questions and to be good for the country. Najib cannot even answer and has not answered any question, beyond exercising elegant silence or saying the allegations are not true.
22. There is also an attempt to divert attention from my question by saying that I am siding with the opposition, even that I have become leader of the opposition.
23. If saying something that is similar to the opposition makes me aligned with the opposition, then Najib must be more with the opposition than me because he agreed with the opposition to abolish the ISA, the prevention of crime law and ignore the NEP. He also wanted to abolish the Sedition Act as demanded by the opposition. If UMNO did not object the Sedition Act would have been abolished. So is Najib a member of the opposition?
24. I am still an UMNO member. My disagreement is with the leader, not with the party. I criticised the leader, not the party. It is simply because I want to see the party win. It will not win if Najib is the leader.
25. I had great hopes when Najib took over from Abdullah.
26. But he did even worse than Abdullah, losing more badly in Selangor where he was the Head of UMNO. Thre are so many scandals surrounding him now. His popularity is now even lower than when he led the BN in 2013. In a number of constituencies the margins won by Barisan Nasional (BN) are very narrow.
27. Sabah and Sarawak, are now no longer safe, no longer BN’s fixed deposits.
28. Is it too absurd to predict defeat for the BN in 2018.
29. As for my sons, if I had wanted them to succeed in politics I could have done so when I was Prime Minister. If they succeed it will be by their own effort. If the people don’t like them they will not get this support. - chedet.cc

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.